PDA

View Full Version : Cancer cured...


Thunder
01-31-2007, 07:41 AM
http://www.studentprintz.com/home/index.cfm?event=displayArticlePrinterFriendly&uStory_id=c7794f20-dfb1-4494-892d-b529895da103

Scientists cure cancer, but no one takes notice

David McRaney
Posted: 1/23/07
EDITORS NOTE:

Since the original publication of this article we have been inundated with responses from the public at all walks of life. It is important to note that research is ongoing with DCA, and not everyone is convinced it will turn out to be a miracle drug. There have been many therapies that were promising in vitro and in animal models that did not work for one reason or another in humans. To provide false hope is not our intention. There is a lot of information on DCA available on the web, and this column is but one opinion on the topic. We hope you will do your own research into the situation. So, we have added links to resources at the end of this column.

END NOTE

Scientists may have cured cancer last week.

Yep.

So, why hven't the media picked up on it?

Here's the deal. Researchers at the University of Alberta in Edmonton, Canada found a cheap and easy to produce drug that kills almost all cancers. The drug is dichloroacetate, and since it is already used to treat metabolic disorders, we know it should be no problem to use it for other purposes.

Doesn't this sound like the kind of news you see on the front page of every paper?

The drug also has no patent, which means it could be produced for bargain basement prices in comparison to what drug companies research and develop.

Scientists tested DCA on human cells cultured outside the body where it killed lung, breast and brain cancer cells, but left healthy cells alone. Rats plump with tumors shrank when they were fed water supplemented with DCA.

Again, this seems like it should be at the top of the nightly news, right?

Cancer cells don't use the little power stations found in most human cells - the mitochondria. Instead, they use glycolysis, which is less effective and more wasteful.

Doctors have long believed the reason for this is because the mitochondria were damaged somehow. But, it turns out the mitochondria were just dormant, and DCA starts them back up again.

The side effect of this is it also reactivates a process called apoptosis. You see, mitochondria contain an all-too-important self-destruct button that can't be pressed in cancer cells. Without it, tumors grow larger as cells refuse to be extinguished. Fully functioning mitochondria, thanks to DCA, can once again die.

With glycolysis turned off, the body produces less lactic acid, so the bad tissue around cancer cells doesn't break down and seed new tumors.

Here's the big catch. Pharmaceutical companies probably won't invest in research into DCA because they won't profit from it. It's easy to make, unpatented and could be added to drinking water. Imagine, Gatorade with cancer control.

So, the groundwork will have to be done at universities and independently funded laboratories. But, how are they supposed to drum up support if the media aren't even talking about it?

All I can do is write this and hope Google News picks it up. In the meantime, tell everyone you know and do your own research.

This is a column of opinion written by Printz Executive Editor David McRaney. Comments can be sent to printz@usm.edu

Snk
01-31-2007, 09:11 AM
If this is true....then our world is really sad. Jesus....

L1veUndead
01-31-2007, 10:27 AM
Thats why I hate money. I mean come on we need it to survive, but the cost of life, love, and the well being of many other things to greed is just inhumane. I say kill all the corporations.

Hoplon
01-31-2007, 02:35 PM
I did a little research and is looks like this cure has been known about for 10 years!

There are books out that claim that we've been able to cure cancer for over 50 years now. They claim that specific radio frequencies are capable of destroying the cells. If this actually works it would work for virtually any disease known to man. I'm not saying that it actually works(although there are tons of books on the subject) but if it did the drug companies would take heavy losses.

Sckoarn
02-01-2007, 08:46 AM
Note the location of the work.

My home town, here in Socilist, Canada.

Tell me, if a company were to produce and give this away, but had other products, would you buy more products from that company? Of course you would. We would love them for just being decent, and that way giving loyalty to purchase from them other products. It's so simple.

Hoplon
02-01-2007, 06:33 PM
Note the location of the work.

My home town, here in Socilist, Canada.

Tell me, if a company were to produce and give this away, but had other products, would you buy more products from that company? Of course you would. We would love them for just being decent, and that way giving loyalty to purchase from them other products. It's so simple.

That is absolutly true. The only problem is how do get the word out about what they did to the average person?

Ranma
02-01-2007, 06:44 PM
Theres no money in curing a disease. The moneys in treating a disease. Sad as this is, its true. Why cure Herpes when we can put someone in $125 a month medication untill they die? A $50 pill once, or $125 every month. Do the math..

Thunder
02-01-2007, 06:49 PM
People suck.

L1veUndead
02-01-2007, 10:30 PM
If a loved one of mine has cancer and is going to die with a cure available. I will straight up kill someone. I would put myself in jail forever to brutalize someone in the worst possible way my mind could possibly imagine for putting one of my loved ones through that kind of pain.

Thunder
02-02-2007, 08:19 AM
Here's another kicker. Angel and I were watching the news two days ago and on the ticker running at the bottom this goes by "Maryland Senate votes down bill to pass cancer cure law." WTF! Who votes down a cure for cancer. Even a cure for ONE kind of cancer, I don't care if it's a cure for hair cancer it should still be cured.

HHBizzle
02-02-2007, 10:35 AM
Here's another kicker. Angel and I were watching the news two days ago and on the ticker running at the bottom this goes by "Maryland Senate votes down bill to pass cancer cure law." WTF! Who votes down a cure for cancer. Even a cure for ONE kind of cancer, I don't care if it's a cure for hair cancer it should still be cured.


yup yup
sad sad world
$$$$$$ and OIL Rule
Until then, the oil century will prevail.