Hae-Yu
08-02-2007, 10:36 AM
Well, the crooks are at it again. A collection of Representatives say that because government information is on P2P networks, that P2P apps are a national security risk. Several lambasted Lime Wire chairman for his part in this dastardly scheme to undermine national security.
Nevermind that it's the fault of the federal employees or contractors who are installing P2P apps on their work PCs or taking sensitive work home. Or the fault of network admins not properly securing their networks. Their argument is like saying "federal employees will inevitably say something they aren't supposed to, therefore we will remove everyones' ears."
This article (http://www.builderau.com.au/news/soa/US-Congress-P2P-networks-harm-national-security/0,339028227,339280469,00.htm)deals with the political side.
This article (http://computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&taxonomyName=privacy&articleId=9027949&taxonomyId=84) deals with the technology side.
The only reason they would paint P2P as a security risk is because they've been instructed to by their masters at the RIAA and MPAA.
Nevermind that it's the fault of the federal employees or contractors who are installing P2P apps on their work PCs or taking sensitive work home. Or the fault of network admins not properly securing their networks. Their argument is like saying "federal employees will inevitably say something they aren't supposed to, therefore we will remove everyones' ears."
This article (http://www.builderau.com.au/news/soa/US-Congress-P2P-networks-harm-national-security/0,339028227,339280469,00.htm)deals with the political side.
This article (http://computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&taxonomyName=privacy&articleId=9027949&taxonomyId=84) deals with the technology side.
The only reason they would paint P2P as a security risk is because they've been instructed to by their masters at the RIAA and MPAA.